- The article is about functionalism in sociology; for other uses, see functionalism.
- This article includes a treatment of structural functionalism, quite different from the linguistics-based structuralism of other (generally later) anthropologists like Claude LÚvi-Strauss
In the social sciences specifically sociology and sociocultural anthropology, functionalism also functional analysis, is a sociological philosophy that originally attempted to explain social institutions as collective means to fill individual biological needs. Later it came to focus on the ways social institutions fill social needs, especially social solidarity. Functionalism is associated with Emile Durkheim and more recently with Talcott Parsons (Marshall 1994: 190-1). Since functional analysis studies the contributions made by sociocultural phenomena to the sociocultural systems of which they are a part many functionalists argue that social institutions are functionally integrated to form a stable system and that a change in one institution will precipitate a change in other institutions; expressed by Durkheim and others as an organic analogy. Functionalism, originating as an alternative to historical explanations, was one of the first twentieth century anthropological theories, until it was superseded by structural-functional analysis or structural-functionalism.
Structural-functionalism takes the view that society consists of parts (e.g. police, hospitals, schools, and farms), each of which have their own functions and work together to promote social stability . Structural-functionalism was the dominant perspective of cultural anthropologists and rural sociologists between World War II and the Vietnam War. Along with conflict theory and interactionism functionalism is one of the three major sociological traditions.
A social function is, "the contribution made by any phenomenon to a larger system of which the phenomenon is a part." (Hoult 1969: 139) This technical usage is not the same as the popular idea of a function as an "event/occasion" or a duty, responsibility, or occupation. A distinction, first made by Robert K. Merton, is made between manifest and latent functions (Marshall 1994: 190-1) and also between functions with positive (functional or positively functional) and negative (dysfunctional) effects (Hoult 1969: 139). "Any statement explaining an institution as being 'functional or 'dysfunctional' for men[sic] could readily be translated with no loss of meaning into one that said it was 'rewarding' or 'punishing'." (Homans 1962:33-4)
Functional alternative (also functional equivalent or functional substitute) indicates that, "just as the same item may have multiple functions, so may the same function be diversely fulfilled by alternative items." (Merton 1957: 33-4) The concept may serve as an antidote to "the gratuitous assumption of the functional indispensability of particular social structures." (ibid: 52)
In the 1960s, functionalism was criticized for being unable to account for social change or structuralist contradictions and conflict and thus often called consensus theory . However, Durkheim used a radical form of guild socialism along with functionalist explanations, Marxism acknowledges social contradictions and uses functionalist explanations, and Parsons evolutionary theory describes the differentiation and reintegration systems and subsystems and thus at least temporary conflict before reintegration (ibid). "The fact that functional analysis can be seen by some as inherently conservative and by others as inherently radical suggests that it may be inherently neither one nor the other." (Merton 1957: 39)
Stronger criticisms include the epistemological argument that functionalism attempts to describe social institutions solely through their effects and thereby does not explain the cause of those effects, or anything, and the ontological argument that society can not have "needs" as a human being does, and even if society does have needs they need not be met. Anthony Giddens argues that functionalist explanations may all be rewritten as historical accounts of individual human actions and consequences. (ibid)
Prior to social movements in the 1960s, functionalism was the dominant view in sociological thinking; after that time conflict theory challenged the current society, which functionalist theory defended. According to some opponents, functionalist theory contends that conflict and challenge to the status quo is harmful to society, and therefore tends to be the prominent view among conservative thinkers.
Jeffrey Alexander (1985) sees functionalism as a broad school rather than a specific method or system, such as Parson's, which is capable of taking equilibrium (stability) as a reference-point rather than assumption and treats structural differentiation as a major form of social change. "The name 'functionalism' implies a difference of method or interpretation that does not exist." (Davis 1967: 401) This removes the determinism criticized above. Cohen argues that rather than needs a society has dispositional facts: features of the social environment which support the existence of particular social institutions but do not cause them. (ibid)
Famous functionalists include:
See also: justified irresponsibility, cultural anthropology, Important publications in functionalism(psychology), Important publications in functionalism(sociology), systems theory
- Marshall, Gordon (1994). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Sociology. ISBN 019285237.
- Hoult, Thomas Ford (1969). Dictionary of Modern Sociology.
- Merton, Robert (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure, revised and enlarged. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.
- Homans, George Casper (1962). Sentiments and Activities. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
- Davis, K (1967). "The Myth of Functional Analysis as a Special Method in Sociology and Anthropology", System, Change, and Conflict: a Reader on Contemporary Sociological Theory and the Debate Over Functionalism, eds.: Demerath, N.J., III, and Peterson, Richard. New York: The Free Press.
Last updated: 04-30-2005 11:17:40