Search

The Online Encyclopedia and Dictionary

 
     
 

Encyclopedia

Dictionary

Quotes

 

Anti-psychiatry

Beginning in the 1960s, a movement called anti-psychiatry claimed that psychiatric patients do not necessarily have a "mental illness", but in fact are individuals that do not ascribe to the same conventional belief system, or consensus reality, shared by most people in their particular culture. Adherents of this movement often refer to "the myth of mental illness", after Dr. Thomas Szasz's controversial book, The Myth of Mental Illness.

Contents

Origins of anti-psychiatry

The term 'anti-psychiatry' was first used by David Cooper in 1967, though opposition to either psychiatry in general, or its practices, predates this coinage; surrealism's opposition to psychiatry predates it by decades. R. D. Laing, a psychiatrist, has been very influential; another psychiatrist, Thomas Szasz, is equally important, but he rejects the label "anti-psychiatry" based on several disagreements with Laing's approach. Other critics of psychiatry often associated with the anti-psychiatry movement include Dr. Peter Breggin and Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, a psychoanalyst who uncovered evidence that Sigmund Freud had suppressed observations of child sexual abuse. Many antipsychiatrists put terms such as "mental patient" in quotation marks to show their rejection of, or ambivalence toward, the terminology of conventional psychiatry. Also, some new age religions, such as Scientology believe that psychiatry is harmful to spirituality. Psychiatrists have said that Scientology only opposes psychiatry because psychiatrists have said that Scientology's and other new age methods for treating mental illness such as Dianetics, are ineffective.

Libertarianism has opposed psychiatry or abuses of psychiatry on constitutional or other legal grounds. Among other popular movements against psychiatry are: the Psychiatric survivors movement; persons charged with abuse based on repressed memories; political prisoners of totalitarian regimes; believers in a range of anti-realist ideas including the theory of reality enforcement; and certain documenters of the Nazi holocaust. The United States Libertarian Party can also be associated with anti-psychiatry as it has opposed involuntary commitment in its platform.lp.org Anti-realists have argued that the definition of a "lack of capacity to recognize reality," both clinically and legally, constitutes or could constitute a direct attack on their ideas. Holocaust documenters point out that medicalization of social problems and systematic euthanasia of people in German mental institutions in the 1930s provided the institutional, procedural, and doctrinal origins of racial mass murder of the 1940s. The Nuremberg Trials convicted a number of physicians, mostly psychiatrists, who held key positions in both eras of Nazi murder, providing further overlap between psychiatry and oppression, according to Szasz and others. A sermon against the earlier practice by Bishop August Clemens Graf von Galen of Münster delivered on August 3, 1941 is credited with inspiring a group of young medical students to publish anti-Hitler pamphlets in 1942 and 1943 in the name of White Rose.

Cooper, who coined the word, was a Marxist, many Marxists oppose contemporary psychiatry, but the anti-psychiatry movement is by no means homogenous ideologically, and Szasz approached psychiatry's problems from a libertarian perspective and argued that any form of socialism would lead to more medicalization and strengthen psychiatry.

Most, if not all antipsychiatrists oppose inhumane treatment of mental patients (or even their status as "mental patients" in the first place), either through the damaging effects of long-term institutionalization or the use of specific interventions given without informed consent. Electroconvulsive therapy, or ECT, has been used to sedate and punish difficult psychiatric patients, rather than for therapeutic purposes, and even some psychiatrists oppose ECT based on studies of its safety and effectiveness. Others, such as Szasz and Breggin, contend that even accepted therapeutic practices remain instruments of social control. Punitive use of "treatment", including ECT, isolation, and restraint has diminished, but is still widely documented.

There has been a resurgence of ECT research and treatment in the past decade, for treatment of a wide range of mental illnesses including severe depression, but many things about ECT are still poorly understood, including exactly how ECT works, and opponents of the practice allege that ECT causes brain damage and has killed several patients on whom it was used, some without their consent.

Observation of the abuses of psychiatry in the Soviet Union also led to questioning of the validity of the practice of psychiatry in the West. In particular, the diagnosis of political dissidents in the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic with sluggishly progressing schizophrenia, led some to question the existence of schizophrenia. To a lesser extent, psychiatry is used as a coercive arm of various groups in the United States against dissidents and whistleblowers today [1].

Some such as Szasz and Breggin argue that the body of information making up the discipline consists mostly of vague and non-falsifiable hypotheses, or, worse, hypotheses not testable without resorting to unconscionable and inhumane experiments on human beings. The indeterminacy of psychiatric diagnoses make it useful as a mechanism of social control, according to these authors.

During the 1970s the anti-psychiatry movement acquired sufficient respectability to advocate restraint from many of the worst psychiatric abuses. Jurists such as David Bazelon brought legal force and stature to anti-psychiatry sentiments. Still, in the modern therapeutic culture that often relies on pharmaceuticals as an important part of psychotherapy, those who question the ethics and efficacy of psychiatric practice in general are far from mainstream.

Arguments against anti-psychiatry

The belated discovery of evidence suggestive of biological and genetic bases, for a limited number of the wide range of conventionally accepted mental illnesses (see DSM IV), may be eroding support for the claim, widespread within the anti-psychiatric movement, that mental illness is more a social label than a biological disorder.

Anthropological studies have claimed that roughly equivalent percentages of people in a variety of cultures, some very different to modern Western culture, develop a disease recognized by that culture as such, with similar symptoms to schizophrenia; subsequent medical examination of such afflicted individuals has shown certain physical abnormalities similar to those evidenced in schizophrenics.

However, the lower rates of diagnosis for the forms of schizophrenia accepted in Western Europe than in the United States of America, has led some to question the criteria for diagnosis, and even that in some cases schizophrenia is deliberately misdiagnosed in the United States as a means of political or philosophical repression, or, it is more resonable to assume, as the result of increasing pharmaceutical industry marketing influence upon mental health professionals. DSM-IV-TR also notes that there is "a far higher incidence [of schizophrenia] for second generation African Caribbeans living in the United Kingdom."

The form of treatment also may vary according to suspect criteria; young black males in the United States are disproportionately prescribed high doses of "anti-psychotic" medication, and African Americans are disproportionately subjected to involuntary commitment.

Many people diagnosed with a mental illness or illnesses - and many of those who have family members or close friends who have been diagnosed with mental illness - find the views of the anti-psychiatry movement contrary to their own experience with mental illness. They believe that the very real and terrible suffering produced by mental illnesses have been effectively relieved by psychiatry and social treatment programs. One of their strongest advocates is Dr. E. Fuller Torrey. Torrey maintains that psychiatry diagnoses "normal" people. He also believes in the forcible medication and confinement of those he believes have genuine neurological problems.

Thomas Szasz points out that one of implications of the argument that mental illness does not exist must be that the insanity defense must be abolished. He insists that someone who has killed someone under the influence of psychosis should be fully criminally responsible for his actions. This position is regarded as inhumane by many people. However despite perceptions caused by sensationalist news stories, most people with psychiatric labels suffer violence by others more than they commit violence.

Modern anti-psychiatric views

Some who are active in anti-psychiatry have not challenged the illness of psychiatric patients but merely challenged the practice of involuntary commitment from a legal or civil liberties perspective. Many people argue that even if it is sometimes necessary to detain a few people with extreme mental illnesses behind bars, that society is far too eager to lock up people with minor mental illnesses (see New Freedom Commission on Mental Health). The growing practice in the UK, and elsewhere, of "care in the community" was instituted partly in response to such concerns. On June 22, 1999, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Olmstead v. L.C., against unnecessary confinement of people with disabilities, including the mentally ill, in institutions. However, in the United States, 42 States have now passed legislation allowing court-ordered involuntary treatment of outpatients with psychiatric drugs.

A wide concern is of over-diagnosis. Again, while some advocates argue that serious mental illness does exist, currently too many people are diagnosed as mentally ill - and sometimes detained involuntarily in mental hospitals - when they are (or their speech or behaviour is) merely different (or said to be different) from the prevailing attitudes of their society. There have been allegations that teenagers are particularly susceptible to improper involuntary commitment, and bounty hunters have even been used to take them to private psychiatric hospitals against their will. The treatment of patients in private psychiatric hospitals, chiefly teenagers, has been the subject of investigations by (U.S.) state attorneys general.

A few individuals have criticized some State statutes in the United States that provide for involuntary commitment, for being unconstitutional as they violate the First, Fourth or Fifth Amendments. (However, there have been court rulings that the Fifth Amendment is not applicable to these cases.) They argue that, in those cases in which the statements or writings of the individual examined by a psychiatrist - who will possibly be certified as being in need of treatment - forms the basis for the diagnosis, then the deprivation of liberty which will result (if the individual is so found) will actually be a result of his speech or writing, and testimony taken while in custody, would therefore be in violation of the United States Constitution.

In 1998 Szasz and others staged the Foucault Tribunal on the State of Psychiatry in Berlin (named for the philosopher Michel Foucault, who conceptualized madness in The History of Madness in the Classical Age (1961) and other works as a social construction that enforces a definition of normality eminently useful to the functioning of power over bodies). This tribunal reached what could be said to be a preordained verdict -- that, among other things, "We demand the abolition of the mental patients laws as a first step toward making psychiatry accountable to society."

Many of the premises of anti-psychiatry have been adopted by psychologists working to treat mental disorders without medication, including sexual addiction counselor, Joe Zychik.

One organization often confused with the anti-Psychiatry movement is the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and Dr. Thomas Szasz. Scientology has used its considerable financial resources, funneled through CCHR, to wage media campaigns against various psychiatrists, psychiatric organizations, and pharmaceutical companies (especially Eli Lilly). Dr. Breggin and other prominent figures and organizations in the anti-psychiatry movement have emphatically denounced efforts to associate them with Scientology, from which they are completely independent and, often as not, vehemently opposed. The prominence of Dr. Szasz - a co-founder of the CCHR - within the anti-psychiatry movement adds to this confusion.

One controversial offshoot of the anti-Psychiatry movement is the Pro-ana movement, whose members argue that anorexia nervosa is an alternative lifestyle rather than a disorder.

External links

Last updated: 08-11-2005 23:04:30
Last updated: 08-17-2005 08:54:16