Oophorectomy

Oophorectomy is the surgical removal of the ovaries of a female animal. In the case of non-human animals, this is also called spaying. It is a form of sterilization.

The removal of the ovaries together with the Fallopian tubes is called salpingo-oophorectomy. Oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy are not common forms of birth control in humans; more usual is tubal ligation, in which the Fallopian tubes are blocked but the ovaries remain intact.

In humans, oophorectomy is most usually performed together with a hysterectomy - the removal of the uterus. Its use in a hysterectomy when there are no other health problems is somewhat controversial.

In animals, spaying involves an invasive removal of the ovaries, but rarely has major complications; the superstition that it causes weight gain is not based on fact. Spaying is especially important for certain animals that require the ovum to be released at a certain interval (called estrus or "heat"), such as cats and dogs. If the cell is not released during these animal's heat, it can cause severe medical problems that can be averted by spaying or partnering the animal with a male.

Oophorectomy is sometimes referred to as castration, but that term is most often used to mean the removal of a male animal's testicles.

See also


Self-defense

(Redirected from Self defence)

This article needs cleanup.
This article needs to be edited to conform to a higher standard of article quality. After the article has been cleaned up, you may remove this message. For help, see How to Edit a Page and the style and How-to Directory .


This article should be merged with Self-defence (law).

Self-defense (or self-defence) usually refers to the use of violence to protect oneself; this forms the basis for many of the martial arts. Self-defense is generally understood to have two degrees: reasonable force (or non-lethal force) and deadly force.

National self-defense against a war of aggression, refers to defensive wars and is regarded by some as a possible cause for a just war.

Courts generally find that the violence a defendant uses in self-defense must in some fashion be comparable to the threat faced, so that deadly force should only be used in situations of "extreme" danger.

Self-defense is a possible justification for what would otherwise be breaking the law. Defendants who use this defense argue that they should not be held liable for what is normally a crime, since the actions taken were intended to protect the defendant or others from danger.

Many courts have ruled that a "path of retreat" exists, and that self-defense is only acceptable, as a legal defense, when there was insufficient opportunity for the defendant to flee. However, in defense of property, the "castle exception" (see: Edward Coke) argues that one cannot be expected to retreat from one's own home.

Courts tend to rule against the right of an individual to "preemptively" engage in self-defense. For example, victims of domestic violence are generally not considered justified in murdering an individual whom they believe will someday attack with lethal force.

Many martial arts are less effective for self defense today than they were in days of old. Styles such as karate, kung fu and tae kwon-do are more focused on the sports, show, and traditional aspects of the arts, although many good schools also teach self defense classes.

There are surprisingly few martial arts styles that teach real fighting techniques for self-defense. From the martial arts practiced world-wide two such styles are Brazilian jiu jitsu, and Krav Maga. In the US & Canada, Jim Wagner and Chris St-Jacques, Jim's number 1 student, have acquired a good reputation with there 'Reality Based' training scenarios.

See also:

Last updated: 02-08-2005 00:29:19